Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Organ at risk sparing by non-coplanar prone breast radiotherapy on Halcyon/Ethos linacs utilizing breast couch slewing
Speleers, B.; Stouthandel, M.E.J.; Vakaet, V.; Paelinck, L.; Schoepen, M.; Van Greveling, A.; Van Esch, A.; Wéra, A.-C.; Remouchamps, V.; Van Hoof, T.; Veldeman, L.; De Gersem, W.; De Neve, W. (2026). Organ at risk sparing by non-coplanar prone breast radiotherapy on Halcyon/Ethos linacs utilizing breast couch slewing. NPG Scientific Reports article in press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-54571-4
In: Scientific Reports (Nature Publishing Group). Nature Publishing Group: London. ISSN 2045-2322; e-ISSN 2045-2322, meer
|  |
| Trefwoorden |
Cancer
Diseases > Neoplasms > Breast cancer
Medical and health sciences > Basic sciences > Oncology
Medical research
Physics
Prone position
Radiotherapy
|
| Author keywords |
Organ at risk sparing; Treatment planning; Deep inspiration breath hold |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Speleers, B.
- Stouthandel, M.E.J.
- Vakaet, V.
- Paelinck, L.
- Schoepen, M., meer
|
- Van Greveling, A.
- Van Esch, A.
- Wéra, A.-C.
- Remouchamps, V.
|
- Van Hoof, T.
- Veldeman, L.
- De Gersem, W.
- De Neve, W.
|
| Abstract |
Organ at risk (OAR)-dose reductions are needed to minimize radiation toxicity in settings with high OAR-doses, like adjuvant breast and lymph node radiotherapy. Non-coplanar techniques, combined with prone positioning and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) techniques, could accomplish this. A planning study was performed in patients requiring left-side adjuvant breast and axillary/periclavicular lymph node irradiation (n = 8). Simulation was performed in prone crawl position using DIBH. Coplanar and non-coplanar short-arc VMAT plans were compared. Non-coplanar plans featured ≤ 20° angular separation between planes. Feasibility was tested using a CAD model, including a prone crawl breast couch positioned in an up to 20° angle (transverse plane) with the couchtop. Non-coplanar techniques can further reduce radiation exposure. Adding beams in planes with ± 15° to ± 20° angular separation with the transverse plane yielded > 20% mean-dose reductions simultaneously to heart, lungs and esophagus, compared to coplanar plans. Plans with ≤ ± 20° angular separation with the transverse plane proved feasible on linacs lacking couch isocenter rotations. Angular separation of ± 15° seems the best compromise between OAR-sparing and technical challenges. Non-coplanar radiotherapy options yielded superior OAR sparing compared to coplanar techniques in patients requiring adjuvant breast and lymph node irradiation and should be considered for improved radiation toxicity prevention. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
